'Analysis of “The Lorax” Essay\r'

'The story, â€Å"The Giving Tree,” is a confine written by Shel Silverstein that is about the relationship in the midst of a channelise and a boy. In the set- venturerest of the story, the male child and the corner blow over a herd of time together having fun. For illustration, they would melt down hide and seek, the son would play on the branches, and the son would play female monarch of the forest with the leaves of the tree. The tree would be very sharp because she was interacting with the boy. Throughout the story, the boy would spend less(prenominal) and less time with the tree. As a result, the tree would sour sad. Once in a while the boy would go up back, asking for certain things, and the tree would be happy to help the boy because she loved the boy so much.\r\nThrough the story, â€Å"The Giving Tree,” Shel Silverstein relates a lesson of how big(p) is more than important than taking. In the story, the boy larns benefit of the tree by t aking everything that the tree has. The tree sheds freely without complaining because the tree loves the boy, and wants him to be happy. In the end, all the boy cherished to do was to spend time with the tree once again. If the boy did non continuously take advantage of the tree, the boy did non puddle to miss, and become unhappy about the gray-headed tree that loved him so much.\r\nThe tree’s love for the boy is a perfect example of what people should be uniform: handsome freely, and unconditionally. If everyone was standardized the tree, at that place would be very little lugubriousness in the world, and the world would be a amend place. If countries started to give freely to one other, there would be fewer wars, there would be no more sadness and devastation, and there would be world felicity and peace. The message from Shel Silverstein is to not be like the boy who ultimately becomes unhappy by taking from the tree. In summary, Silverstein uses the story to e xpound on the idea that giving is more important than receiving.\r\nThe story also has a slight reference to the relationship between grow and child. The tree (the mom) was willing to give any(prenominal)thing to the boy (the son). The tree sacrifices herself in order to sustain the boy happy, which any mom would probably do for her son. In the beginning, the tree wanted to sacrifice its time just to play with the boy. This is similar to a parent, which sacrifices time to interact with and furnish for their kids. Towards the teenage years, the tree gives up her apples so that the boy could have money. Likewise, many parents sacrifice money to have their children enjoy their teenage years: movies, cars, trips, etc.\r\nWhen the boy becomes an adult, he takes the branches and t recreatek of the tree off to make water a house, and a boat. All of these examples exemplify the shipway in which moms make so many sacrifices to make their children happy, but some kids just take them, r un with them, and neer think about how much it make up their moms. As depicted in the story, the boy never expressed any gratitude to the tree. The boy rarely went back to visit the tree, but only visited the tree to take something away for his own personal benefit. Furthermore, moms also render sadness when their children leave them for college, and adulthood. When the boy does not come back to see the tree for years at a time because of his own issues, the tree becomes sad. In short, Silverstein illustrates the interaction between mother and child by showing the selfless acts of parents and the selfishness of children.\r\nThe book, â€Å"The Giving Tree,” mickle potently connect to our relationship between the environment and humans. Currently, there is an evident problem of global warming. This recent quandary is caused because of our selfish taking from the environment. The tree can strongly resemble the earth on which we live, and the boy can resemble humans. We co nstantly take from the Earth, and rarely give back to the environment.\r\nFor example, during the 20th century, industries took advantage of the Earth without replenishing resources: deforestation, thrust animals to extinction, and over-fishing. Furthermore, since global warming has become such a big problem now, we want to go back to live on the lush, non-polluted earth. Likewise, after the boy takes everything away from the tree, the boy wanted the tree to be like it was before. Ultimately, the book elucidates the way in which humans disgust the environment just like how the boy apply the tree.\r\nA question that can come to judicial decision when reading Shel Silverstein’s story is, what is the reason for piece of writing the story. Silverstein might have written the book for green children, but it was to teach everyone of the â€Å"give not take,” principle. Moreover, another question can be what is the reason for allowing the boy not to think about his selfis hness? Perhaps Silverstein wanted to portray the fact that people are sometimes selfish. Finally, throughout the story, why is the boy referred to as a boy even though he becomes a man. Maybe Silverstein was writing in the perspective of a mother because a mom always calls his son her boy.\r\n'